Skip to content
BotGigs

No card required to start. Already signed up? Sign in.

twelve providers read september 2026

Data annotation services and what data labeling companies charge for image, video and audio

We opened twelve annotation providers and looked for one thing: a number. Two printed a rate card. Four had no pricing page that loaded at all. So we took the rates that do exist, multiplied them by published throughput, and worked out what hourly labor each quote is really priced on.

Vendor pages read directly · No paid placements

Hire brief generator

hire
stack

That was the one free brief for this browser.

To hire for the job, put it on the public BotGigs job board: $99 a month on Growth, applications straight to your inbox, cancel any time.

Post a job, $99 a month

for a different task

Best-effort estimate, not a quote or a match

We could not scope your task just now, so this is an example brief for a different automation, shown so you can see the format. Your free brief has not been used: try again in a minute.

scope of work

who to hire

Screen for

Effort estimate

questions to ask your hire

Like the brief? Put the job in front of specialists on the board.

the short answer

Data annotation services are priced per unit, per hour or per project, and almost nobody publishes the number. Of twelve providers read in September 2026, two published a rate. Where rates do exist they run from $0.015 for a keypoint to $5.00 and up for a medical label, and the same nominal task can differ by sixty times between vendors. The useful move is to convert a per unit quote into implied hourly labor: at the published benchmark of 200 to 400 bounding boxes an hour, a $0.02 box implies $4 to $8 an hour, against a directory median of $37 an hour across 345 annotation companies. Those are not two prices, they are two labor markets. The crossover where a dedicated annotation team beats buying per label sits near $0.09 to $0.25 per unit, which simple bulk images almost never reach and segmentation, medical imaging and preference data almost always do.

The audit

What twelve data annotation companies actually publish

Ranking annotation vendors one to twelve would be invented precision, because none of them let an outsider measure output quality. What is checkable is what each one prints on its own site. Every cell below was read directly in September 2026. Where a pricing page returned an error to automated reading we say so rather than guess.

Provider Numeric rate published What it says Delivery disclosed
Label Your Data Yes $0.015 keypoint, $0.02 bounding box, $0.02 NLP entity, $6 an hour annotator time Wilmington DE and Nicosia Cyprus offices, team across 22 countries
BasicAI Yes $0.03 bounding box, $0.05 segmentation, $0.05 polygon, $0.02 keypoint, $0.05 3D cuboid, $0.06 3D segmentation Not stated on the rate page
Scale AI No Free first 1,000 labeling units and 10,000 curated images, then pay as you go by card. No unit rate shown United States
Labelbox Page did not resolve Pricing URL returned an error to automated reading Not read
Encord No numeric rate readable Pricing page did not return a usable figure Not read
Appen Page did not resolve Pricing URL returned an error to automated reading Not read
iMerit Page did not resolve Pricing URL redirected then returned an error Not read
Surge AI Page did not resolve Pricing URL returned an error to automated reading Not read
HiTech BPO No Request a proposal only Headquarters Ahmedabad India, plus New York, Ontario CA and London addresses
Anolytics No Request a quote only Headquarters Levittown NY, three delivery centers in Noida India
ARDEM No Contact for pricing New Jersey phone line, no address or delivery location given
DataVLab No, and says so States that most annotation companies do not publish rates and that any published figure would mislead Not stated

Two patterns are worth naming. First, the providers who publish a rate are platform led and sell a self serve tier; the providers who sell managed teams publish nothing, because a managed team is priced on scope. Second, an American address is not an American delivery location. HiTech BPO lists New York, California and London addresses with its headquarters in Ahmedabad, and Anolytics lists a New York headquarters with all three delivery centers in Noida. That is not a criticism, it is a fact you should get in writing, and it is the same pattern we found when we audited AI development companies in the USA.

The rate card

Published data labeling prices by task type

These are the bands that exist in public, assembled from vendor rate cards and from the category pricing guides that aggregate them. Read the width of each band as the real message: a range that spans sixty times is telling you the words do not define the work.

Task Published range Cheapest named rate Cost of 10,000 units at the low end
Image classification $0.02 to $0.15 per label Aggregated band $200
Bounding box, object detection $0.02 to $0.90 per object $0.02 Label Your Data, $0.03 BasicAI $200
Keypoint $0.015 to $0.02 per object $0.015 Label Your Data $150
Polygon $0.05 to $0.257 per annotation $0.05 BasicAI $500
Semantic segmentation or mask $0.05 to $3.00 per label $0.05 BasicAI $500
3D cuboid $0.05 to $3.00 per label $0.05 BasicAI $500
Text sentiment $0.01 to $0.10 per label Aggregated band $100
Named entity recognition $0.02 to $0.25, legal and medical to $1.00 and up $0.02 Label Your Data $200
Audio transcription and annotation $0.10 to $10.00 per minute Aggregated band $1,000 per 10,000 minutes
Video annotation $0.50 to $10.00 per minute Aggregated band $5,000 per 10,000 minutes
Medical or scientific imaging $1.00 to $8.00 per item Aggregated band $10,000

The extremes are instructive. A polygon is $0.05 at BasicAI and $0.257 at Google, a five times gap on a shape. A 3D cuboid is $0.05 at BasicAI and $3.00 at Amazon, a sixty times gap. Nobody is lying. A cuboid drawn on a clean synthetic scene and a cuboid drawn on a sparse night time LiDAR sweep are the same noun and different jobs, and the noun is what buyers search on. Volume moves the number too: discounts of roughly 10 to 30 percent are normal above 100,000 units, and one guide applies 5 to 30 percent to reach about $225,400 for 2,300,000 objects across 100,000 images, which works out at just under $0.10 an object.

The conversion

Turn any per label quote into the hourly wage it assumes

This is the one calculation that makes annotation quotes comparable, and we have not seen a vendor publish it. Multiply the per unit rate by realistic throughput and you get the hourly labor the quote is priced on. Published benchmarks put an experienced annotator at 200 to 400 bounding boxes an hour on clean scenes with few clearly visible objects, and 50 to 150 an hour on dense scenes with small or occluded objects or where every item is double checked.

Published box rate Implied hourly at 200 to 400 boxes Implied hourly at 50 to 150 boxes What that wage looks like
$0.02 (Label Your Data) $4.00 to $8.00 $1.00 to $3.00 Matches the $6 an hour this vendor publishes separately. The two numbers agree
$0.03 (BasicAI) $6.00 to $12.00 $1.50 to $4.50 Offshore managed team economics
$0.05 (low aggregated band) $10.00 to $20.00 $2.50 to $7.50 Offshore with a real QA pass, or nearshore
$0.13 (worked example, all in per image) $26.00 to $52.00 $6.50 to $19.50 Straddles the $37 directory median
$0.25 $50.00 to $100.00 $12.50 to $37.50 Onshore, or specialist domain work
$0.90 (high aggregated band) $180 to $360 $45 to $135 Either expert review or a very slow task

Two caveats, because this arithmetic is only honest with them attached. The throughput benchmark is for bounding boxes, so applying it to segmentation, 3D cuboids or medical review would produce nonsense; there is no equivalent published throughput for those tasks, which is precisely why their rates vary sixty fold. And implied hourly labor is not the vendor's cost, since tooling, QA, project management and margin all sit on top. Used carefully it still answers the question that matters: a $37 an hour quote and a $0.02 per box quote are not competing offers for the same work, and any shortlist that puts them side by side is comparing labor markets, not vendors.

The crossover

Buy per label, or hire a dedicated annotation team?

The category gives opposite answers to this question, in public, which is worth seeing before you trust either one. One published worked example puts 20,000 images at $15,000 to $18,000 with an in house team against roughly $2,600 outsourced, so outsourcing wins by nearly seven times. A different guide tells buyers to expect the outsourcing price to be more than 1.5 times the cost of a potential in house team, so in house wins. Both are internally consistent. They differ on one hidden assumption: whether the in house team stays busy.

That is the whole decision. A salaried annotator costs the same whether they label 200 items or 20,000, so the in house route is a bet on utilization, and the first worked example loses that bet by charging one 20,000 image project for a full time hire's idle capacity. The crossover is not a volume, it is a price per unit, and you can compute it in one line:

$0.09 to $0.25

the crossover per unit

An annotator at the $37 an hour directory median, working at 150 to 400 units an hour, costs this much per unit. Below it, buying per label is cheaper. Above it, a dedicated team is.

$0.02 to $0.15

simple image work

Classification and clean bounding boxes sit under the crossover, usually well under. Buy these per label from a vendor with a published rate and hold them to a quality threshold.

$0.50 to $8.00

segmentation and medical

These sit far above the crossover, so a dedicated team that learns your guidelines is normally cheaper and always more consistent than paying per mask.

The practical read: if your dataset is a large pile of simple images, per label outsourcing wins almost every time and you should not be reading about dedicated teams. If your work is complex, regulated, subjective or continuous, per unit rates climb past the crossover fast and you are better off hiring people who stay on the project, build up domain judgment and stop needing the guidelines re explained every batch. That second case is also the one where annotation stops being a purchase and starts being part of the model team, alongside the machine learning engineers who consume the labels and the data engineering work that gets the raw records to them in the first place.

Scope

What is actually included in data annotation services

A per unit rate covers the drawing. Everything that makes the labels usable is negotiable, and an unbundled quote is how a cheap rate becomes an expensive project.

Guideline development

Someone has to decide what counts as an object, what to do with partial occlusion, and how to handle the ambiguous 5 percent. This is the highest leverage hour in the whole project and it is rarely in the rate.

Quality assurance passes

Ask how many review passes the quoted rate buys. A $0.02 box that needs a second pass at $0.02 is a $0.04 box, and a vendor quoting single pass against a competitor quoting double pass looks half the price while delivering half the quality.

A measured agreement threshold

Quality has to be a number on a gold set you control, not an adjective. Without a threshold there is no definition of a failed batch and therefore no free rework.

Rework and its price

Get in writing that batches below the threshold are re done at no charge. This single clause is worth more than a 20 percent rate discount.

Tooling and export

Platform led vendors may keep your labels inside their tool. Require export in an open format on demand, not just at the end of the contract.

Project management

On managed teams this is bundled and invisible. On per unit platforms it is your job, which is a real cost in your own engineers time and the reason cheap platforms sometimes lose on total cost.

Pre annotation

Running a baseline model first so annotators correct proposals rather than draw from scratch roughly doubles throughput without hurting quality. If you already have a weak model, insist this is used and priced in.

Security and data handling

Annotation is one of the few workflows where a human sees your raw records one at a time. Delivery country, device policy, subcontracting rules and deletion on completion all belong in the contract.

Ownership of the labels

The labels and the guidelines you paid to develop should be yours on payment. Name them explicitly, the same way you would name model artifacts in a build contract.

How to buy

Five steps that make annotation quotes comparable

01

Build a 200 item gold set first

Label 200 representative items yourself, including the awkward ones. This is your ruler. Without it you cannot score a vendor, define a failed batch or settle a disagreement, and you will end up arguing about quality in adjectives.

02

Send every vendor the same sample

Give all of them an identical 200 item paid pilot with your guidelines attached. Score the returns against your gold set. This costs a few hundred dollars and replaces the entire vendor selection problem with a measurement.

03

Demand an all inclusive number

Ask for one price covering annotation, QA, project management, tooling, rework and reporting. Vendors who will only quote the drawing step are quoting a fraction of the job, and you will meet the rest of it as change orders.

04

Convert the quote to implied hourly

Multiply the per unit price by the throughput you observed in your own pilot. If the implied wage is $3 an hour, you now know what you are buying and can decide whether that is acceptable for your data and your risk posture.

05

Ask where the work is done, then verify

Get the delivery country per person in writing and check it against the addresses on the vendor site. Several firms with US headquarters run every delivery center offshore, which may be fine, but it should be a decision rather than a surprise.

By modality

Image, video, audio and text annotation services compared

The modality changes the unit, and the unit changes how a quote can mislead you. These are the four buying patterns worth knowing before you ask for a price.

Image annotation services

Priced per object or per image, and the cheapest thing to buy per label because throughput is measurable and the task is well defined. Classification runs $0.02 to $0.15 and boxes $0.02 to $0.90. Watch for images with 40 objects being quoted at a per image rate, which is where cheap becomes expensive in reverse. These labels feed straight into a computer vision development pipeline.

Video annotation services

Priced per minute at $0.50 to $10.00, and the widest band in the category because a minute of video can mean 30 tracked frames or 1,800. Always convert a per minute quote to per frame at your actual sampling rate before comparing two vendors, or you are comparing nothing at all. Object tracking across frames is the expensive part.

Audio annotation services

Priced per minute at $0.10 to $10.00 depending on whether you need transcription, speaker separation, timestamped events or emotion tagging. Accented and multi speaker audio costs more for the honest reason that it takes longer, and the number of passes matters more here than in any other modality.

Text and NLP annotation

Priced per entity or per document at $0.01 to $0.25, rising past $1.00 for legal and medical where the annotator needs domain training. This is also where preference data and RLHF work sits, which is expert labor priced by the hour rather than per span, and it is what generative AI development work pipeline.

The honest version

When you should not hire an annotation team through us

If you need 50,000 clean images boxed once and never again, do not hire anyone through a marketplace. Go to a vendor with a published per unit rate, run a paid pilot against your gold set, and buy the cheapest one that clears your threshold. At $0.02 to $0.05 an object nothing we can arrange will beat that, because you are buying a commodity and commodity pricing is the correct answer.

BotGigs is the right route when the work sits above the crossover: segmentation or medical imaging where the per unit price is already $0.50 and up, regulated data where you need to name the delivery country and the people, preference and evaluation data for language models where the labor is expert judgment rather than drawing, or a continuous pipeline where the same people should stay on the project for a year and get better at your guidelines. In those cases you are hiring a team, not buying units, and you should see rates and locations before you commit rather than after a discovery call. If you also need the model built on top of the labels, the same brief can cover both, which is how most AI development company engagements actually start.

Questions

Questions buyers ask about data annotation services

How much do data annotation services cost?

Published per unit rates run from $0.015 for a keypoint to $5.00 and up for a medical label. The two vendors we found who print a rate card list bounding boxes at $0.02 and $0.03 per object. Aggregated category bands put image classification at $0.02 to $0.15, object detection at $0.05 to $0.90, semantic segmentation at $0.50 to $2.00 and up, audio at $0.50 to $3.00 a minute and video at $1.00 to $10.00 a minute.

Do data annotation companies publish pricing?

Almost none. Of twelve providers we opened directly in September 2026, only two published a numeric rate. Four had no pricing page that resolved at all. One category pricing guide states the position openly: most annotation companies do not publish rates, and sales pages say contact us for a quote. That is why comparing two quotes usually means comparing two different definitions of the same word.

Is it cheaper to outsource data annotation or hire an in-house team?

It depends entirely on utilization, and the category cannot agree. One published worked example puts 20,000 images at $15,000 to $18,000 in house against roughly $2,600 outsourced. Another guide tells buyers to expect outsourcing to cost more than 1.5 times an in house team. Both are right for their own assumption. The crossover sits near $0.09 to $0.25 per unit.

How much does data labeling cost per image?

For simple images, between about $0.02 and $0.15 each, and one published worked example lands at $0.13 per image all in for a 20,000 image project including setup. Complexity is what moves it. Segmentation runs $0.50 to $2.00 and up per image and medical or scientific imaging reaches $2.00 to $8.00, because those tasks take minutes rather than seconds.

What is the difference between data annotation and data labeling?

Commercially, nothing. Vendors use the two words interchangeably and price them identically, which is why the same firm often ranks for both. If anyone draws a line it is that labeling suggests assigning a class to a whole item while annotation suggests marking regions, boxes, keypoints or spans inside it. Buy on the specific task and quality bar, never on the label.

How do you choose a data annotation company?

Price the task, not the category. Send the same 200 item sample to every vendor, require an all inclusive quote covering annotation, QA, project management, tooling, rework and reporting, ask for the delivery country and the annotator pay basis, and set a measured agreement threshold against your own gold set. The vendor who scores best on your sample is the answer.

How much should I pay per hour for data annotation?

The third party directory median across 345 annotation companies is $37 an hour, while the cheapest published vendor rate is $6. Both are real and they describe different labor markets. Work out which one your per unit quote implies by multiplying the rate by realistic throughput: at 200 to 400 boxes an hour, a $0.02 box implies $4 to $8 an hour of labor.

Is outsourced data annotation secure enough for regulated data?

Only if you contract for it. Annotation is one of the few AI workflows where humans see raw records one at a time, so treat it as data processing rather than as a service purchase. Require the delivery country in writing, named certifications rather than the word compliant, no personal devices, no offshore subcontracting without consent, and deletion of the working copy on completion.

How long does data annotation take?

Published benchmarks put an experienced annotator at 200 to 400 bounding boxes an hour on clean scenes, dropping to 50 to 150 an hour on dense scenes or where every item is double checked. Individual output runs roughly 150 to 300 images a day against 1,000 to 1,500 for a five person team. Pre annotation with a baseline model roughly doubles throughput.

When should I hire a dedicated annotation team instead of buying per label?

When your per unit price is above roughly $0.09 to $0.25, which is what an hourly annotator costs divided by realistic throughput. Complex, sensitive or continuous work crosses that line: segmentation, medical imaging, RLHF and preference data, anything needing domain knowledge or a stable team that learns your guidelines. Simple bulk images almost never do.

What should be in a data annotation contract?

A measurable quality threshold on an agreed gold set, rework priced at zero below that threshold, the delivery country and subcontracting rule, ownership of the labels and the annotation guidelines you paid to develop, an export path in an open format rather than the vendor platform only, and a stated policy on whether your data may be reused to train anything.

Do I pay for rework and quality assurance separately?

Often yes, and it is the single most common reason a cheap headline rate ends up expensive. A $0.02 box that needs a second pass at $0.02 is a $0.04 box. Ask every vendor to state whether the quoted rate includes QA, how many review passes it buys, what agreement level it guarantees, and who pays when a batch fails that level.

Get started

Above the crossover, and want a team rather than a per unit invoice?

Describe the labeling work in a hire brief and get matched to vetted annotation teams and machine learning specialists, with rates and delivery location up front.

No card required to start.